A CDIO APPROACH TO TEACH SUSTAINABILITY IN ARCHITECTURE

A CDIO APPROACH TO TEACH SUSTAINABILITY IN ARCHITECTURE

Y. Ho, Y. Leong (2023).  A CDIO APPROACH TO TEACH SUSTAINABILITY IN ARCHITECTURE. 336-348.

The CDIO initiative, an educational framework that comprises 12 standards for evaluating and reforming engineering programs. The framework has become a guiding principle for program leaders to reform and evaluate curriculums, create benchmarks, and align learning goals with worldwide application, making it a framework for continuous improvement. The School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE) at Singapore Polytechnic adopted the CDIO framework to guide non-engineering diploma programs towards continuous improvement. A professional development course was designed by the ABE Teaching & Learning (T&L) unit to coach program leaders on evaluating their programs.  Their initial task after completing part 1 coaching was to map their diploma program to CDIO standards.

This paper focuses on how one of the non-engineering programs, a three-year Diploma in Architecture from the Singapore Polytechnic, maps itself to CDIO (Conceive, Design Implement, Operate) standards, specifically CDIO 3.0, with a specific emphasis on sustainability. This paper first discusses how sustainability knowledge has been incorporated in the program (vertical integration), levelling up progressively over the three years of the program. It then describes the mapping of CDIO standards in the program via three threads: 1) the process of architectural practice; 2) Skills framework for the Architecture sector; 3) Green Mark 2021.  The program addresses 10 out of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and implements them through a horizontal integrated year two curriculum.   The selected course, Design Studio I (Architecture) (DS1(A)) is centered on an integrated design project that provides students with the opportunities to apply and contextualize sustainability knowledge, skills, and attitudes with technological advances. This paper also presents the findings from students’ feedback and learning reflections of DS1(A) as well as the teaching team’s perspectives. It then concludes with considerations of incorporating sustainability and the challenges of teaching sustainability in DS1(A).

Authors (New): 
Yenn Giin Ho
Yiat Yam Leong
Pages: 
336-348
Affiliations: 
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
Sustainability development
design-implement
Architecture
non-engineering
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO optional standard 1
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Building and Construction Authority (2021a, September). Green Mark 2021 (GM: 2021) Certification Standard, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/sustainability/green-mark-certification-scheme/green-mark-2021: 
Building and Construction Authority (2021b, September). Green Mark 2021 Resilience (Re) Section, Green Mark 2021 (GM: 2021) Certification Standard. https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/sustainability/green-mark-certification-scheme/green-mark-2021: 
Crawley, E. (2022). Optional Standard 1.0: Sustainable Development, CDIO Optional Standards 3.0, CDIO Knowledge Library. Cambridge, MA; Worldwide CDIO Initiative. http://www.cdio.org. Professor Edward Crawley, crawley@mit.edu: 
Marouli, C., Misseyanni, A. Papadopoulou, P. & Lytras, M. (2016a). ICT in Education for Sustainability: Contributions and Challenges. In Proceedings of the International Conference: Future of Education, Florence, Italy, 29 June–2 July 2016, pp.189-193.: 
Pizmony-Levy, O. & Michel, J.O. (2018). Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors in Higher Education: Investigating the Role of Formal and Informal Factors. Columbia/Academic Commons.: 
Rosentrater, K. A. & Burke, B. R. (2017). University Students and Sustainability. Part 1: Attitudes, Perceptions, and Habits, Journal of Sustainability Education 16.: 
Go to top
randomness