EMBEDDING SUSTAINABILITY AND ETHICAL COMPETENCES INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOLLOWING CDIO

EMBEDDING SUSTAINABILITY AND ETHICAL COMPETENCES INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOLLOWING CDIO

J. Angelva, M. Mielikäinen, T. Tepsa (2023).  EMBEDDING SUSTAINABILITY AND ETHICAL COMPETENCES INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOLLOWING CDIO. 190-200.

Integrating sustainable development and ethics into engineering education is essential for every higher education institution. The CDIO syllabus contains both principles, and CDIO 3.0's optional standards promote the integration of CDIO principles into the curriculum of educational institutions. In this context, <Institution> conducted research to determine the level of familiarity engineering students have with ethics and sustainability and to gather their suggestions on how to incorporate these principles into the curriculum. An anonymous web survey was administered to students in three different engineering fields, including ICT (N = 58), Land Surveying (N = 12), and Civil Engineering (N = 32). The survey evaluated their understanding of sustainability and ethics and sought their opinions on how these topics were addressed in their coursework. The content analysis also revealed the perspectives of the students, which suggested practical examples, learning tasks, and the occurrence of themes cross-cuttingly, e.g., in learning projects. The results reflect the thoughts and ideas of stakeholders and give suggestions for practical implementation to incorporate themes into learning. The inclusion of these themes in the practical implementation of the study courses contributes to the integration of ethics and sustainable development into the curricula following the CDIO 3.0 principle and improves the quality of the curricula for its part. The results of a study investigating engineering students' knowledge of sustainability and ethics, as well as their suggestions for incorporating these themes into the curriculum, can be of benefit to the CDIO community. The study found that students generally understand the principles of these themes, but also suggested practical examples and cross-cutting themes for more effective integration into the curriculum. The findings can inform the development of new teaching methods and learning materials, as well as improvements to current CDIO standards, to better integrate sustainability and ethics into engineering education. Ultimately, this can lead to a more relevant and engaging learning experience for students, promoting their commitment to becoming socially responsible engineers.

Authors (New): 
Juhani Angelva
Maisa Mielikäinen
Tauno Tepsa
Pages: 
190-200
Affiliations: 
Lapland University of Applied Sciences, Finland
Keywords: 
Sustainability
Ethics
Curriculum
continuous improvement
CDIO optional standard 1
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Alaswad, A., & Junaid, S. (2022). Debate as a tool in engineering and sustainability education. In Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference. Reykjavík University. : 
Angelva, J., Tepsa, T., & Mielikäinen, M. (2017). Team teaching experiences in engineering education a project-based learning approach. In J. C. Quadrado, J. Bernardino, & J. Rocha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th SEFI Annual Conference 2017 Education Excellence for Sustainability (pp. 1182–1189). SEFI, Brussels, Belgium. https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/SEFI_2017_PROCEEDINGS.pdf: 
ARENE. (2022). Recommendation of the shared competences of universities of applied sciences and their application (p. 14). The Rectors’ Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences Arene ry. https://www.arene.fi/wp-content/uploads/Raportit/2022/Kompetenssit/RECOMMENDATION%20ON%20THE%20SHARED%20COMPETENCES%20OF%20UNIVERSITIES%20OF%20APPLIED%20SCIENCES%20AND%20THEIR%20APPLICATION.pdf?_t=1642539550 : 
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. : 
Butt, A. T., Causton, E. W., & Watkins, M. A. (2022). EMBEDDING SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: A COMPLIMENTARY APPROACH TO PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING AND SUSTAINABLE DESIGN. In DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th-9th September 2022.: 
CDIO (2022). CDIO Optional Standards 3.0, in CDIO Optional Standards 3.0. Worldwide CDIO Initiative.: 
Desha, C., Rowe, D., & Hargreaves, D. (2019). A review of progress and opportunities to foster development of sustainability-related competencies in engineering education. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 61-73.: 
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1).: 
Ermer, G., & VanderLeest, S. (2002, June). Using design norms to teach engineering ethics. In 2002 Annual Conference (pp. 7-1253). Montreal, Canada.: 
Guerra, A. (2017). Integration of sustainability in engineering education: why is PBL an answer?. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 18(3), 436-454.: 
Gunnarsson, S., & Klein, I. (2021). Using the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in automatic control courses. In 17th International CDIO Conference, hosted online by Chulalongkorn University & Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Bangkok, Thailand, June 21-23, 2021 (pp. 95-105).: 
Heikkerö, T. (2009). Tekniikka ja etiikka: Johdatus teoriaan ja käytäntöön. Tekniikan akateemisten liitto.: 
Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. (2018). A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and engineering ethics, 24, 551-583.: 
Leiva-Brondo, M., Lajara-Camilleri, N., Vidal-Meló, A., Atarés, A., & Lull, C. (2022). Spanish University Students’ Awareness and Perception of Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainability Literacy. Sustainability, 14(8), 4552. : 
Loendorf, W. (2009, June). The case study approach to engineering ethics. In 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 14-1182). Austin, TX, USA.: 
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Hugo, R., & Campbell D. (2020b). A First Set of Optional CDIO Standards for Adoption, Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2020: 
Martin, D., Conlon, E. & Bowe, B. (2021). Using case studies in engineering ethics education: the case for immersive scenarios through stakeholder engagement and real life data, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. 26(1), 47-63. : 
Pierrakos, O., Prentice, M., Silverglate, C., Lamb, M., Demaske, A., & Smout, R. (2019, October). Reimagining engineering ethics: From ethics education to character education. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.: 
Rosén, A., Hermansson-Järvenpää, H., Finnveden, G., & Edström, K. (2021). Experiences from Applying the CDIO Standard for Sustainable Development in Institution-Wide Program Evaluations. In 17th International CDIO Conference.: 
Rottmann, C., Reeve, D. (2020). Equity as rebar: Bridging the micro/macro divide in engineering ethics education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20, 146-165.: 
Svanström, M., Lozano‐García, F.J. and Rowe, D. (2008). Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 339-351. : 
Thürer, M., Tomašević, I., Stevenson, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on integrating sustainability into engineering curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 608-617.: 
UNESCO. (2017a). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO: 
UNESCO. (2017b). UNESCO moving forward the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations Educ. Sci. Cult. Organ.: 
Go to top
randomness