C. Visser, C. Venner
(2023). SCALING UP PROJECT-BASED LEARNING IN ENGINEERING BEYOND 100 BSC STUDENTS: A PRACTICAL APPROACH.
131-143. Project based learning (PBL) is commonly applied in engineering education, and evaluated positively in terms of learning outcomes and student engagement. However, ensuring depth of the taught material and limiting the workload per teacher is not obvious when implementing PBL, especially for large student populations. Here we share a practical framework to prepare and execute project based learning for groups of approximately 150 BSc students in Mechanical Engineering. We show how a team of Instructors and Teaching Assistants (TAs) allows reducing the workload of individuals in the preparation, execution, and grading phases of the project. In the preparation phase, pairs of TAs draft sections of the project manual that are tested and improved by different pairs of TAs. During project execution, the role of TAs is twofold: (1) They co-supervise two project groups together with one staff member, answering basic and administrative questions. (2) They act as experts for the project groups on the topics that they helped develop, which are sometimes outside of the direct scientific scope of the instructors. Therefore, the TAs act as more knowledgeable others in Vygotski’s theory of constructive learning and therefore provide effective scaffolding, preventing students from getting stuck at places of difficult learning. The instructors (10 staff members, mainly of our research group) take responsibility for the execution and assessment phases to ensure quality, but at a strongly reduced workload because of TA involvement. The implementation schedule for the preparation, execution, and assessment phases of the project are included in the supplementary materials, as well as an example project description on Covid-safe train cabins.
Authors (New):
Claas Willem Visser
Cornelis H. Venner
Affiliations:
University of Twente, Netherlands
Keywords:
Project-Based Learning
Teaching coordination
Scaling
Durability
Agility
quality
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
Reference:
Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 271–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056:
Bhavya, B., Xiao, J., & Zhai, C. (2021). Scaling up Data Science Course Projects: A Case Study. L@S 2021 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430895.3460168:
Botha, M. (2010). A project-based learning approach as a method of teaching entrepreneurship to a large group of undergraduate students in South Africa. Education as Change, 14(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2010.522059:
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26(December 2017), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001:
Connolly, T., & Begg, C. (2006). A Constructivist-Based Approach to Teaching Database Analysis and Design A Constructivist-Based Approach to Teaching Database Analysis and Design Thomas M Connolly ; Carolyn E Begg. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(1), 43–53.:
Domínguez, C., & Jaime, A. (2010). Database design learning: A project-based approach organized through a course management system. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.001:
Feichtner, S. B., & Davis, E. A. (1984). Why some groups fail: A Survey of students’ experiences with learning groups. Journal of Management Education, 9(4), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256298400900409:
McLeod, S. A. (2012). What Is the zone of proximal development? https://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html:
Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9–34.:
Peters, E. M. A., & Powell, P. C. (1994). The Effects of the Introduction of a Project-Based Curriculum in the Mechanical Engineering Course At The University of Twente. International Conference on Project Work in University Studies, 193–203.:
Robinson, J. K. (2013). Project-based learning: Improving student engagement and performance in the laboratory. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 405(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6473-x:
Sanders, J. W., West, M., & Herman, G. L. (2016). Scaling up project-based learning for a large introductory mechanics course using mobile phone data capture and peer feedback. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016-June. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.27341:
Van De Poel, I., & Royakkers, L. (2007). The ethical cycle. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9121-6:
Wallin, P., Lyng, R., Sortland, B., & Veine, S. (2017). Experts in teamwork - A large scale course for interdisciplinary learning and collaboration. 13th International CDIO Conference, 1–11.:
on November 20, 2023 - 13:46
frebyst